新高考背景下英语命题之阅读理解课件-高三英语上学期一轮复习专项

新高考背景下英语命题之阅读理解课件-高三英语上学期一轮复习专项

新高考背景下，英语阅读理解的命题趋势和要求发生了哪些变化？本文将从命题背景、命题纲领性文件、基于高考评价体系的英语科考试内容改革实施路径、情境分析、2021年全国新高考I卷的分析、阅读理解的效度、2022年试卷的关键能力要求、阅读理解试题的命制流程等多个维度，为您详细解读新高考英语阅读理解的命题特点和备考策略。

命题前的学习

命题的纲领性文件

基于高考评价体系的英语科考试内容改革实施路径

情境

2021全国新高考I卷（福建、湖南、湖北、河北、江苏、山东、广东）

2021年甲卷包含各种类型语篇，考查平衡均衡；考查题型包括细节理解3、推理判断10（观点态度1、文章来源1、）、文章标题1、词义猜测1、主旨大意1。因此可以看出，甲卷的思维量是很大的。高阶思维的体量很足。

阅读理解的效度

2022年试卷

关键能力

阅读理解试题的命制

阅读理解命制大体流程

试题命制过程

A

21.Where can a visitor see the coexistence of species?

A. In Texas

B. In Philadelphia

C. Outside Cairo

D. In New York City

22.Which place might attract a college student who is exploring his options?

A. Houston Zoo

B. Grand Egyptian Museum

C. Franklin Institute

D. American Museum of Natural History

23.What do the four exhibitions have in common?

A. They are held in the US.

B. They are launched in 2023.

C. They are related to wildlife.

D. They all add something new.

Which museum best suits a history/space addict/wildlife lover?

A. Grand Egypt Museum

B. American Museum of Natural history

No Man Is An Island: The Wisdom Of Deliberating Crowds

MARCH 12, 2018 10:58 AM ET

By

Tania Lombrozo

On March 7, 1907—almost 111 years ago to the day—the English statistician Francis Galton published a peculiar observation.

At a county fair held in Plymouth, 800 visitors had participated in a competition to guess the weight of an ox. While most people's estimates were too high or too low—falling an average of 37 lbs. away from the true weight of 1,198 lbs.—the median of everyone's guess was off by only 9 lbs., or less than 1 percent of the true weight of the ox.

This example illustrates what has come to be known as the wisdom of crowds effect. In some cases, the average of a large number of independent estimates can be quite accurate, even when the estimators have no special expertise.

The average competitor, Galton wrote of the ox competition, was probably as well fitted for making a just estimate of the dressed weight of the ox, as an average voter is of judging the merits of most political issues.